Previous Entry | Next Entry

all ov yr novels r belonging to us

  • Apr. 5th, 2008 at 12:50 AM
Proust book
I spent the whole night at [info]robot_mel's drinking and talking about BOOKS BOOKS BOOKS. I realized at some point that 1) it hadn't fazed me Bill was reading Sader Masoch in German 2) people don't normally ask me if I'm reading Proust in French (but my answer, "No, because I want to finish it in this lifetime" seemed to suffice) 3) maybe I'm in some freaking culturally elite group but I DIDN'T HAVE TO APOLOGIZE FOR IT but somehow the fact that "reading in the original language" came up just didn't seem like a surprise though I've never met anyone who reads in that many languages. Not that I apologize for my occasional dip into good books anyway but it was all just great! BOOKS BOOKS BOOKS BOOKS BOOKS! Why Gatsby is or isn't any good, is Steinbeck annoying and if so why isn't Kerouac, is fandom about 19th century literature just too sad for words or do we have some hot tips to share ;-) , what does it mean to be an "American" novel, funny stories about singing on the tube, how to tease a cat that likes to eat peas, how to get your maximum caloric intake from a vending machine when you have 50 cents, college jobs we held that didn't cut the mustard, favorite divy restaurants in Seattle, what an average bar tab at the Mercury looked like for each of us, why Dai Yu was burying flower petals and is Dream of the Red Chamber essentially a Chinese Gothic novel; and so on.

I feel alive and happy. This is exactly why I moved here. Too funny we had dinner with people we could have met in Seattle - but never did!

Comments

[info]varina8 wrote:
Apr. 5th, 2008 04:09 am (UTC)
...but...but...Kerouac is annoying to re-read once you're over 30. At least, On the Road is.
[info]webcowgirl wrote:
Apr. 5th, 2008 09:59 am (UTC)
We didn't _agree_ about much, but I enjoyed talking with people who had well-formed opinions. Bill didn't like Steinbeck because he wasn't interested in the characters he wrote about and how boring and common they were - he is much more interested in writings with messed-up people at the center. He also made a good argument for Anatole France and Madame de Sevigny.
[info]varina8 wrote:
Apr. 5th, 2008 05:43 pm (UTC)
I'm ashamed to admit that I know both of those authors more through what has been written about them than by them. I waded through the requisite Steinbeck, but he's never been a favorite of mine. Lately I've been a bit of a magpie, pouncing on whatever's bright and shiny (this week it's a reread of Slouching Toward Bethlehem and Touching My Father's Soul.
[info]webcowgirl wrote:
Apr. 5th, 2008 08:51 pm (UTC)
I can see Bill's point but I got so much pleasure out of Sea of Cortez that I just had to read Cannery Row and Tortilla Flat. Faulkner is really just so much better, though, but reading Steinbeck is like ooking at a Grant Woods or a Diego Rivera painting - really dated but just reeking with the essence of that time.
[info]varina8 wrote:
Apr. 6th, 2008 12:45 am (UTC)
I can see that. A strong sense of place can almost always seduce me. I went through a strong Steinbeck phase my last year in high school, but probably haven't looked at him since. Maybe I'll snag a copy of Sea of Cortez as a refresher.
[info]robot_mel wrote:
Apr. 5th, 2008 10:33 am (UTC)
Nicest write up of people over for dinner we've ever had.

Was great to see you both! Please come back again for dinner soon! :)

Profile

Glasses
[info]webcowgirl
Web Cowgirl 衛 思 維

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com